|
SIMPLE JUSTICE EXCERPT Pages
408-411 |
|
SIMPLE JUSTICE Pages 408-411 Mr. Brown’s day in court …Then it was the turn of Oliver Brown, the principal plaintiff. It is one of the idiosyncrasies of American constitutional
law that cases of profound consequence are often named for plaintiffs whose
involvement in the original suit is either remote or merely fortuitous. So it
was with the Brown of Brown v. Board of
Education. Nothing in his background seemed to suggest that he would
stand against the tide of apathy and fear in the black community of To Oliver Brown’s oldest daughter, Linda Carol, the noise became routine but not the size of the trains. “They always looked enormous to me,” she remembers. We used to make up games with the trains and got to know some of the trainmen in the switching yards. They would give us candy sometimes. I remember one very big, robust switchman who always waved at us three girls and yelled, ‘Hi, boys!’ and we’d always call back, ‘Hi, Mary!’ He reminded me of Santa Claus. But the most thrilling thing about living near there was when the Mid-America came to town by railroad, and we’d always be the first to know because they’d bring the show cars up on a siding. We loved to see the red-and-yellow cars with animals and the troupers’ quarters and the silver flatcars with the words ‘Royal American Shows’ on the sides.” Life for the Brown girls had its less spectacular pleasures as well. It was a daily highlight when their father would come back from his job as a welder repairing boxcars at the Santa Fe shops about half a mile east on First Street. He would toss his goggles aside, sometimes catch a quick nap to chase the fatigue that his job induced, and then joke with his youngsters over the dinner table, though he was normally a stern man. Friday nights were special times when they would pop corn and Oliver and Leola Brown would reminisce about their own childhood days, and afterward Oliver would be there to hear their bedtime prayers. It was a religious household – grace before meals, the Child’s and later the Lord’s Prayer before retiring, Sunday School each week without fail – and Oliver Brown gave what he could in time and energy to his work as part-time assistant pastor at St. John AME, the big church about seven blocks from home. |
|
SIMPLE JUSTICE Pages 408-411 Linda Brown attended the It is Linda’s recollection that a registration notice for all the families in the Sumner School zone had been stuck in the door of every home, including the Browns’, late that summer and that her father, simply fed up that September with the long trip that Linda had had to make each day to the Monroe School, tried to enroll her at Sumner in defiance of the segregation rule. When he was refused, according to later accounts of the incident based largely on Linda’s recall, Brown took his case to the NAACP, which then began the case bearing his name. Oliver Brown died in 1961 at the age of forty-two without ever giving a detailed account of his participation in the case, but it is almost certain that the many versions of the story that cast him in the role of heroic leader are inaccurate. This is not to say that he did not step forward when summoned – only that the fight had begun long before and that Oliver Brown was never in the vanguard. The local NAACP under McKinley Burnett, and with the forceful guidance of Esther Brown, almost certainly had taken the initiative in approaching Oliver Brown that summer, as it had several dozen other black parents whose children had to make particularly long trips to school. Litigation had been contemplated for several years, and Oliver Brown, though hardly an NAACP enthusiast, qualified as an ideal litigant. Some who knew him well attributed Brown’s uncharacteristic participation in the case to his deep conviction that God had approved it. |
|
SIMPLE JUSTICE Pages 408-411 Little Linda Brown was shielded from the case, for the most part. At no time did her father sit her down and tell her what it was all about. But she does remember going with him to an evening meeting at the Church of God, where the NAACP’s Mac Burnett was a leader of the congregation, and being called up to the front of the room to stand on the podium while somebody demanded of the audience, “Why should this child be forced to travel so far to school each day?” She was not in the courtroom, though, that Monday morning in late June of 1951 when her father uneasily took the witness stand. He was nervous. And he was not helped much by attorney Charles
Bledsoe, whose inexperience was apparent. He left out basic steps in the
examination, such as establishing what school Linda attended. Brown failed to speak up firmly enough
until coaxed by Judge Huxman, and when he did, his discomfort showed as he
said that Linda’s school was fifteen blocks away and then corrected it to
twenty-one. But then Oliver Brown pulled himself together and got his story
out. Linda had to leave home at Q. You say your child goes four blocks to the bus pick-up point? A. She goes six blocks to the pick-up point. Q. Six blocks, pardon me. Don’t you know as a matter of fact that in many, many instances there are children that go to the white schools in this town that go thirty and thirty-five blocks and walk to get there? CARTER: I object to that. BROWN: Where at? CARTER: I see no materiality to this question. JUDGE HUXMAN: Objection will be sustained. That is not proper cross-examination of this witness. With that, Oliver Brown was
excused. It was |